press

New reinterpretation removes core ESA protections for piping plovers, salmon, grizzly bears, and countless other imperiled species.

The decision to rescind the regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) could enable extractive industries to destroy or modify the habitat of imperiled plants and animals — the places they need to feed, shelter, raise their young — even if it results in their death or injury.

Seven former officials from Republican and Democratic administrations oppose action that would strip habitat destruction from the law’s definition of harm.

Public outpouring highlights growing support for one of the world’s most endangered whale species

Conservation Groups Across U.S. Respond to Trump Administration’s Attacks on Endangered Species Act

Coordinated demonstrations across Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Massachusetts, and California oppose sweeping rollback threatening marine life in the Gulf

Hundreds of Public Events Amid Concerns for the Future of the Endangered Species Act

Custom Wrapped Truck Promotes Wolf Coexistence

From Monarchs to Mule Deer, Bill Seeks to Connect Habitats and Save Imperiled Wildlife

The decision to pull Westerman’s ESA rollback bill (H.R. 1897) from floor consideration is good news for the Endangered Species Act, threatened and endangered wildlife and for the millions of people who care about protecting nature and cherished species.