The Endangered Species Act in a New Administration

Share on facebook
Share on pinterest
Share on twitter

The Endangered Species Act in 2021

The Trump Administration has rolled back more than 130 environmental safeguards, including those intended to protect wildlife. We are now in a biodiversity extinction crisis, but we did not get into this state in just the past four years, it was decades in the making. 

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) has not been a priority to any Administration or Congress, unless to harm it. Every Administration and Congress has been willing to trade ESA, and wildlife protections, away. President Obama did more to protect the environment then President Trump, yet he weakened ESA protections, enforcement and implementation, destroyed wildlife habitat for profit and failed to help some highly endangered species. As we move forward with the new Biden-Harris Administration we must ensure history does not repeat itself.  

BIODIVERSITY CRISIS NEEDS EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The sixth mass extinction of wildlife is accelerating and scientists warn it may be a tipping point for the collapse of civilization.

 

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION 

SALAZAR 

President Obama nominated a very moderate Secretary of Interior. Salazar’s voting record while in Congress was weak in the arenas most important to a Secretary of the Interior: protecting scientific integrity, combating global warming, reforming energy development and protecting endangered species.

SPECIES

Wolves: The Obama administration issued a rule that would delist wolves across the United States in 2013.  

Grizzly Bears in the Northern Rockies: The Obama Administration tried to delist the Yellowstone grizzly bear population, only to have the courts reverse the decision and reinstate ESA protections. 

Whales:  The Obama Administration advocated to suspend the international whaling moratorium and, separately, declined to adequately enforce international agreements on commercial whaling.  

HABITAT

Oil and Gas: After the Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico oil spill, Obama’s Department of Interior (DOI) did not ban seismic testing and oil and gas drilling in the Arctic ocean and off the Atlantic Coast until shortly before the 2016 election.  

Obama signed legislation in 2015 ending the decades-old ban on crude oil exports creating an economic incentive to “drill baby drill”. Oil production doubled between 2009 and 2016 and the administration aggressively pursued the XL pipeline.

 

THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT 

The Obama Administration created a regulation that put hundreds of endangered plants and animals at greater risk of extinction by dramatically reducing protections for their designated critical habitat. 

The administration issued a policy that allows the FWS to exclude areas from critical habitat based on, in many cases, vague promises from landowners to conserve habitat. 

The administration enacted a policy that drastically limits which species get protection in the first place by changing the “significant portion of range” provision.

 

ESA 4(d) rule – loophole 

The 4(d) rule was created to provide the USFWS with flexibility to protect threatened species. However, it has been exploited and used as a loophole to weaken or not protect species at all. The Center for Biological Diversity found that the Obama Administration used this detrimental loophole more than any other Administration.  

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND ESA 

  • Finalized five rules that weaken protections for threatened species and consultation requirements, allow consideration of economic impacts, rather than just science, when doing listing determinations; make it more difficult to consider impacts from climate change on imperiled wildlife; and weaken the critical habitat protection provisions. 

  • Finalized wolf delisting rule, removing all protections of grey wolves in the lower 48.

CONCERNS REGARDING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION

  • Not reversing Trump’s assaults because not considered a priority in light of multiple, more obvious direct “human crises,” and/or some Democrats prefer they stay in place, which creates death blow precedents.

  • Not supporting legislation to strengthen the ESA and wildlife protections and/or supporting harmful legislation.  

THE 117th CONGRESS 

With Democrats in control of the House, Senate and White House we could do much to protect wildlife. However, every vote would be very close, requiring every Democrat, in both the House and the Senate. With a 50-50 split in the Senate, Vice-President Harris will have to break ties. In the House, the Democrats have only a four member lead to get to the all important 218 to pass a bill. 

We will need to push moderates hard and grassroots action will be crucial. We will also have to work with Republicans for any legislation that requires cloture, or sixty votes to pass, and bi-partisan legislation is always stronger.   

We will have less fear of harmful bills passing into law, however we will have to watch for provisions that may be added here and there to “must-pass” legislation. We will have to push and work moderate Democratic Senators, and educate new Senators, so they do not cut deals and set damaging precedents. 

MOVING FORWARD WITH THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION

Now that we understand the recent past, and what the previous administrations did to wildlife and the ESA, we move forward and ensure the Biden-Harris Administration does better. In addition to the great legislation, we might pass in Congress, we have the potential to do great things for imperiled wildlife with the Biden Administration.  

President Obama filled his cabinet with moderates and conservatives that were not helpful for wildlife. So far, some of President-Elect Biden’s nominations have given us hope, including Deb Haaland as Secretary of Interior, Michael Regan as EPA Administrator, and Gina McCarthy and John Kerry working on climate change.  

We do have concerns about some others but we will watch as the nomination hearings progress and will weigh in throughout the process on behalf of wildlife and plants for our members and supporters.    

In 2021, we must, as a coalition, not get intoxicated by access or be seduced by leadership using words, like “science” and “biodiversity” and “environmental justice”. We must look at their actions and push them hard to keep their promises.

Stay Informed!

2 comments on “The Endangered Species Act in a New Administration

  1. We would like to see protections put in place for the Monarch Butterfly whose populations are diminishing due to development and the use of herbicides that destroy the Milkweed plant. We would like to see our government actively promote the planting of Milkweed on public lands. Milkweed is the Monarch’s sole food and their entire life cycle revolves around this plant. Without this effort we will surely see the last of this beautiful and iconic American treasure.

    Thank you
    Edward and Gail Temple
    Brooklyn, NY
    [email protected]ail.com

  2. Have potential candidates for Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service been identified and how are they vetted? The named Deputies are not inspirational for someone who was hoping the Biden administration would put forth r robust advocates for Endangered Species.

    As someone who has worked for years with endangered species I am concerned that the current organizational structure of the Service (which preceded the Trump administration) has buried Endangered Species in Ecological Services rather than Endangered Species being an organizational component equivalent to Refuges. Migratory Birds has been elevated in its place on the organizational chart and at least on the west coast has argued on occasion that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act takes precedence in conflicts with the ESA. How does The Endangered Species Coalition view the current organization and do you have a position on MBTA v ESA?
    Thank you,
    Elizabeth Copper
    Coronado, CA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ArabicChinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanHaitian CreoleHebrewPortugueseSpanishSwedish