Kids Corner

Stand For Wolves: Kids Page

 

Alyssa Grayson from Endangered Species Coalition on Vimeo.


Public hearings were held around the country to give people the opportunity to make their voices heard. Here is a video guide for kids & others explaining how to testify against de-listing wolves. Thanks to KidsAgainstDelisting for sharing the video!

Instructional Mask-making Video: What to Wear to a Wolf Rally, courtesy of the Center for Biological Diversity.

Kids all across the country are worried about wolves and taking action. See the links below for ways that you can get involved also!

Wolfwatcher’s Kids’ Forum

Kids4Wolves

Kids4Wolves Art & Writing Gallery

wolvesartcollage

Kids Book & movie list/reading list

Wolf Facepainting: a How-To Guide from WildEarthGuardians

 

Kids ask Secretary Jewell about her plan to de-list wolves:

Little Lucy puts Interior chief on record on wolf delisting

John McArdle, E&E reporter

Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Description: http://ads.eenews.net/b/ident.gif?b=157&r=s3wfwy2nyt&a=60567&p=2
Six-year-old Lucy from Maine put Interior Secretary Sally Jewell on the record yesterday about a recent Fish and Wildlife Service proposal to remove Endangered Species Act protections for wolves in most of the lower 48 states.

During an appearance at the Center for American Progress to discuss kids and the outdoors, Jewell took a few questions that audience members had written on note cards. One of those questions read: “My daughter Lucy wanted me to ask this question. She is six years old. How can we bring the wolf back to Maine and more wild places? I really love wolves.”

“I like wolves, too,” Jewell declared, before referring to the proposal to remove them from the endangered species list.

“People can say, ‘Oh why did you take them off?’ But the reality is because the wolf populations are no longer faced with extinction,” she said. “And that is a really great news story.”

The proposal, which is now open to public comment, is set to end nearly two decades of federal wolf recovery efforts, except for a small wolf recovery program in New Mexico and Arizona. The plan, which Fish and Wildlife has said it hopes to finalize within the year, would turn wolf management over to the states (Greenwire, June 7).

While the plan has been welcomed by agricultural and hunting groups, it has been blasted by environmental organizations that believe U.S. wolf populations are still fragile.

Jewell noted yesterday that Lucy isn’t the first young wolf supporter she has come across in her brief time as head of the Interior Department.

Last month, on a visit to Rhode Island, a 12-year-old girl gave Jewell a handwritten letter on wolf stationery, the secretary recalled.

“She was a wolf advocate, and she actually asked me not to take them off the endangered species list,” Jewell said, “which is not something I actually have a choice. It’s about science, and you do what the science says; otherwise, you get sued. I’m learning that.

“No matter what you do, you get sued in this job,” she added. “I’m just getting comfortable with lawsuits.”

FWS also used the science argument in its official delisting proposal, noting that the action is based on “the best available scientific and commercial information.”

But environmental groups couldn’t disagree more.

Sylvia Fallon, the director of the wildlife conservation project for the Natural Resources Defense Council, said FWS created its own science that allowed the federal government to wash its hands of the politically tricky issue of wolf protections in most of the country.

“I’m sure she’s listening to the agency biologists and what they are telling her … but they have created their own story,” Fallon said today. “They’re supporting their policy decision with science, but it is science they essentially fabricated to support this decision. … It’s agency science published in an agency journal, all for the purpose of supporting this delisting.”

While protection efforts have allowed wolves to exceeded recovery plans where they exist, Fallon said studies show that wolf populations have recovered in less than 10 percent of their historic range — which includes Maine and New Hampshire, Colorado’s Rocky Mountains, and the Pacific Northwest’s Coast and Cascade ranges.

“No one expects wolves can be recovered in 100 percent of its historic range, but a significant amount of suitable habitat has been identified by scientists that would support wolf populations, and until those areas are occupied by wolves again, recovery has not been achieved,” she said.

Jewell said yesterday that wolf populations in her home state of Washington have come back, as they have in other parts of the Pacific Northwest and the Rocky Mountains. Jewell admitted that she’s not as familiar with population numbers in Lucy’s home of Maine.

But “Maine has probably got a pretty good shot at it because it’s close to Canada, and Canada has a healthier wolf population than the United States does,” she said.

Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife, said today that she hopes Jewell will take the time to learn more about the state of U.S. wolf populations before signing off on the FWS proposal.

“I hope she does listen to the scientists and that she gets personally involved in what happens during the public comment period and that science does indeed inform the decision she needs to make a year from now,” said Rappaport Clark, whose group, like the NRDC, is encouraging the public to get involved in the public comment period.

“It is absolutely about the science, and when it comes to science and whether or not wolves have recovered in the lower 48, we believe the science suggests it has not,” she said. Jewell “owns the [FWS] proposal and she’ll own the decision, so we hope she does the right thing following good science.”